�all unrecognized 1xx responses will be treated as 183.
On Tue, 11 May 2004 Steve Pellegrino wrote : >The IANA registry list of response codes currently defined by standards track RFCs >can be found here: >http://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters > >I'm not sure what is meant by "standard" SIP application below. AFAICS, a UAC >compliant with RFC 3261 will interpret any unrecognized response the same as the x00 >response code of that class (see Section 8.1.3.2). > >Steve > >Agung Prihanggoro wrote: > >>well, if SIP are "extensible" as it said, then you can define your own response >>codes. If you use JAIN-SIP, then try to edit SipResponse.java on >>jain-sip\src\gov\nist\javax\sip\message >> >>but, please notice that your custom response codes won't work with other "standard" >>SIP application. >> >>i hope this can help >> >>-- >>agung >> >>On Tue, 11 May 2004, Laurent BURGY wrote: >> >> >>>Hi, >>>Can i define my own response codes in an extension for a more precise meaning? >>>Is there any class reserved for this use? >>> >>>In general, is there any " private " codes? >>>I couldn't find this nor in the SIP RFC, nor in the HTTP RFC? >>> >>>thx in advance, >>>Laurent. >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Sip-implementors mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors >>> >>> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Sip-implementors mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors >> >> >_______________________________________________ >Sip-implementors mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
