>It can do either. Isn't this statement violating Invite Client Transaction. As per the ICT state machine it is the responsibility of *INVITE client transaction* to generate an ACK on receipt of 300-699 response. I don't think proxy(TU) can tie the ACK for 480 with ACK for 487.
-Ramakrishna -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dale R. Worley Sent: Thu 5/4/2006 11:03 PM To: Sip-Implementors Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] question on the behavior of 487 message. On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 09:15 -0700, Siddhardha Garige wrote: > In this case should proxy wait unitl it gets ACK for 480 and then send > an ACK to 487 ? Or should it consider 480 and 487 as seperate events? It can do either. Dale --- interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability test server _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
