+1

Sachin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] question on the behavior of 487 message.


>
>>It can do either.
> Isn't this statement violating Invite Client Transaction. As per the ICT 
> state machine it is the responsibility of *INVITE client transaction* to 
> generate an ACK on receipt of 300-699 response. I don't think proxy(TU) 
> can tie the ACK for 480 with ACK for 487.
>
> -Ramakrishna
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dale R. Worley
> Sent: Thu 5/4/2006 11:03 PM
> To: Sip-Implementors
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] question on the behavior of 487 message.
>
> On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 09:15 -0700, Siddhardha Garige wrote:
>> In this case should proxy wait unitl it gets ACK for 480 and then send
>> an ACK to 487 ? Or should it consider 480 and 487 as seperate events?
>
> It can do either.
>
> Dale
>
> ---
> interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability test server
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
>
>
> The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments 
> to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and 
> may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or 
> copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all 
> copies of this message and any attachments.
>
> WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient 
> should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. 
> The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
> transmitted by this email.
>
> www.wipro.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to