There seems to be an inconsistency in the rfc3455 P-Called-Party_ID
definition:
according the ABNF, it has an name-addr and not an addr-spec
while in the example, the angular quotes are missing.
Is this a bug in the ABNF?
Regards,
Stefaan
5.2 P-Called-Party-ID header syntax
The syntax of the P-Called-Party-ID header is described as follows:
P-Called-Party-ID = "P-Called-Party-ID" HCOLON
called-pty-id-spec
called-pty-id-spec = name-addr *(SEMI cpid-param)
cpid-param = generic-param
F6 Invite P1 -> UA
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.0.2.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bKg48sh128
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.0.2.20:5060;branch=z9hG4bK03djaoe1
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=938s0
Call-ID: 843817637684230998sdasdh09
P-Called-Party-ID: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 101 INVITE
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
