sip-implementors  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip Registration and Invite forking Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip Registration and Invite forking Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip Registration and Invite forking Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip Registration and Invite forking Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Barman, Sibon B \(Sibon\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Barman, Sibon B \(Sibon\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Barman, Sibon B \(Sibon\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Bin Chen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Registration request with private address and response with public address Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Security aspects of nextnonce in Ramana Reddy
• [Sip-implementors] 500 response due to CSeq order: please add Retry-After Jeroen van Bemmel
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 500 response due to CSeq order: please add Retry-After Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] SipStack problem Emil
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SipStack problem SIMITH NAMBIAR
• [Sip-implementors] Record-Route in dialog Will Quan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Record-Route in dialog Toshniwal, Siddharth
• [Sip-implementors] silenceSupp media attribute Manpreet Singh
• [Sip-implementors] SIPit 20 registration deadline is March 30 Robert Sparks
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIPit 20 registration deadline is March 30 Barman, Sibon B \(Sibon\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIPit 20 registration deadline is March 30 ben . bonnaerens
• [Sip-implementors] HELP ME: questions regarding AKA lambodara lakumi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] HELP ME: questions regarding AKA Gary Cote
  • [Sip-implementors] Dialog termination for 408 rahul
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Dialog termination for 408 Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Dialog termination for 408 Sarkar, Uttam
• [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding ACK for unsuccessful response venkatesh chandran
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding ACK for unsuccessful response Bin Chen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding ACK for unsuccessful response Sreenath Kulkarni
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding ACK for unsuccessful response venkatesh chandran
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] doubt regarding ACK for unsuccessful response Sarkar, Uttam
• [Sip-implementors] query in content types sudhir kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] query in content types Khairunnisa Hassanali
• [Sip-implementors] A question about RFC 3323 (privacy) Hagai Sela \(TA\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about RFC 3323 (privacy) Khairunnisa Hassanali
• [Sip-implementors] Playing early media to the transferee in Attended-Transfer call flow Roval, Ofir \(Ofir\)
• Re: [Sip-implementors] [Megaco] A question about rtpmap Raphael Tryster
• [Sip-implementors] Early media in RFC4240 (Basic Network Media Services with SIP) Alfred E. Heggestad
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Early media in RFC4240 (Basic Network Media Services with SIP) Gary Cote
• [Sip-implementors] 500 server internal error!! dhananjay.sahoo
• [Sip-implementors] High performance sip server Bin Chen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] High performance sip server Arnab Biswas
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] High performance sip server Bin Chen
• [Sip-implementors] question on 10 calls at the same time on phone number do nguyen ha
  • [Sip-implementors] Scenario for 500 Server internal error dhananjay.sahoo
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Scenario for 500 Server internal error Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer-Answer Sumin Seo
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer-Answer Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer-Answer Sumin Seo
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer-Answer Rajnish Jain
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer-Answer Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer-Answer Bin Chen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer-Answer Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer-Answer Bhanuprasad K S
• [Sip-implementors] SIP trunk Michel Eilat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP trunk Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP trunk Satyendra Tiwari
• [Sip-implementors] ACK from Invite blocked by firewall smartnet telecom
• [Sip-implementors] modifying sip headers for indialog messages( for high availability) NandaKishoreE 71062
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] modifying sip headers for indialog messages( for high availability) Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] modifying sip headers for indialog messages( for high availability) Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] SIP register listed contacts. Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP register listed contacts. Rajnish Jain
• [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Bin Chen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Bob Penfield
• [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE and REFER within INVITE dialog Nina Garaca
  • [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Sunil Kumar Verma
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Sunil Kumar Verma
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Sunil Kumar Verma
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Sunil Kumar Verma
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Sunil Kumar Verma
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Benjamin Jacob
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Bu, Wenfei \(Leo\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • [Sip-implementors] Outbound proxy with local routing Siddhardha Garige
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Outbound proxy with local routing Gaurav Kheterpal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Outbound proxy with local routing Siddhardha Garige
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Outbound proxy with local routing KASTURI Narayanan \(kasnaray\)
  • [Sip-implementors] Response for re-invite after Bye is sent? guang_li
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Response for re-invite after Bye is sent? Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Response for re-invite after Bye is sent? Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Response for re-invite after Bye is sent? guang_li
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 Ringing from Proxy(BBUA) Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Importance of To-Tag in 200 OK of Register Bhanuprasad K S
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Importance of To-Tag in 200 OK of Register Joegen E. Baclor
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Importance of To-Tag in 200 OK of Register Bin Chen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Importance of To-Tag in 200 OK of Register Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Importance of To-Tag in 200 OK of Register Bhanuprasad K S
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Importance of To-Tag in 200 OK of Register nadine . staelens
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Importance of To-Tag in 200 OK of Register Bob Penfield
• [Sip-implementors] Call flow and data flow sip ergistration naveed khan
• [Sip-implementors] Status of Diversion header Iliff, Tina
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Status of Diversion header Bala Neelakantan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Status of Diversion header Iliff, Tina
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Status of Diversion header Bala Neelakantan
• [Sip-implementors] CANCELling INVITE Requests trigerred by a REFER . SiM
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCELling INVITE Requests trigerred by a REFER . Dale . Worley
  • [Sip-implementors] REGISTRATION when callid is different Arif
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCELling INVITE Requests trigerred by a REFER . Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] How to create a binding if Contact header is not there in the REGISTER request? Sumit Vaidya
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] How to create a binding if Contact header is notthere in the REGISTER request? Bob Penfield
• [Sip-implementors] Back to Back 407 and 401 Raghu Thodime
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Back to Back 407 and 401 Jeroen van Bemmel
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Back to Back 407 and 401 Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Back to Back 407 and 401 Dale Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Reusing call-id in registers for different AORs Bharrat, Shaun
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Reusing call-id in registers for different AORs Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Reusing call-id in registers for different AORs Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Reusing call-id in registers for different AORs Arif
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Reusing call-id in registers for different AORs Dale . Worley
• Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] INAP operations in SIP prince . philip
• [Sip-implementors] what's the rationale behind the timer value 'T' selection logic in UAC for 491 response to a re-INVITE. NC Reddy
• [Sip-implementors] INAP operations in SIP amit rehalia
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] INAP operations in SIP Fullen, Brian
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] INAP operations in SIP Lee Dryburgh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] INAP operations in SIP amit rehalia
• [Sip-implementors] c= line in SDP Hema R
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] c= line in SDP Prithvi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] c= line in SDP Daniel Corbe
• [Sip-implementors] server-side transaction timers Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] server-side transaction timers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] server-side transaction timers Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] server-side transaction timers Joegen E. Baclor
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] server-side transaction timers Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] server-side transaction timers Joegen E. Baclor
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] server-side transaction timers Sreenath Kulkarni
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] server-side transaction timers Sreenath Kulkarni
• [Sip-implementors] OpenB2BUA Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] OpenB2BUA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• [Sip-implementors] SIP network trace files? Lee, Ron
• [Sip-implementors] Call-Info "purpose" parameter - mandatory? Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] sdp clock rate negotiation Sigrid Thijs
• [Sip-implementors] RFC 4412 - Error Code Yong Xin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 4412 - Error Code Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] RFC 3264 - Placing SDP on hold - How hold differs from initial exchange? Rick Whitesel \(rwhitese\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3264 - Placing SDP on hold - How hold differs from initial exchange? Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Multiple contact bindings - registration response Chaney, Charles \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple contact bindings - registration response Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple contact bindings - registration response Chaney, Charles \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple contact bindings - registration response Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Satyendra Tiwari
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Prithvi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Stephen Paterson
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Prithvi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Stephen Paterson
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Prithvi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header YOSHIKAWA Tomoyuki
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header YOSHIKAWA Tomoyuki
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Max-Forward Header Satyendra Tiwari
• [Sip-implementors] New Transaction Mandeep Ahuja
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] New Transaction Gary Cote
• [Sip-implementors] rfc3261: why lr excluded for redirect and register Contact Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3261: why lr excluded for redirect andregister Contact Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Abu Mohammad Muttalib
  • [Sip-implementors] Fwd: What happens to the ongoing call zhang jw
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Joegen E. Baclor
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Pravesh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Paul Kyzivat
  • [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Abu Muttalib
• [Sip-implementors] SMS Giuseppe Teresi
• [Sip-implementors] Music on Hold varun
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Music on Hold Satyendra Tiwari
• [Sip-implementors] Info on port 5070 Thirumal Margabandhu
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Info on port 5070 Michael Procter
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Info on port 5070 Scott Lawrence
• [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-ID stefaan . willaert
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-ID Vikram Chhibber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-ID stefaan . willaert
  • [Sip-implementors] Comparison of SDP variants between RFC 4566 and RFC 2327 Albrecht . Schwarz
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] Comparison of SDP variants between RFC 4566 and RFC 2327 Dan Wing
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] Comparison of SDP variants between RFC 4566 and RFC 2327 Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • [Sip-implementors] Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Randell Jesup
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Dan Wing
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Randell Jesup
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Dan Wing
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christian Groves
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Dan Wing
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Colin Perkins
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christian Groves

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]