A P-Called-Party-ID can have display name and must have addr-spec. Therefore the ABNF is correct since name-addr = [ display-name ] LAQUOT addr-spec RAQUOT.
In the example LAQUOT and RAQUOT are missing for not only P-Called-Party-ID but also for To and From. ~Vikram The ABNF mention On 2/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There seems to be an inconsistency in the rfc3455 P-Called-Party_ID > definition: > > according the ABNF, it has an name-addr and not an addr-spec > while in the example, the angular quotes are missing. > Is this a bug in the ABNF? > > Regards, > Stefaan > > > > > 5.2 P-Called-Party-ID header syntax > > The syntax of the P-Called-Party-ID header is described as follows: > > P-Called-Party-ID = "P-Called-Party-ID" HCOLON > called-pty-id-spec > called-pty-id-spec = name-addr *(SEMI cpid-param) > cpid-param = generic-param > > > > > > F6 Invite P1 -> UA > INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.0.2.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bKg48sh128 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.0.2.20:5060;branch=z9hG4bK03djaoe1 > To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=938s0 > Call-ID: 843817637684230998sdasdh09 > P-Called-Party-ID: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > CSeq: 101 INVITE > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
