Thanks to Jeroen van Bemmel, I believe this problem has been resolved. 
Thanks Jeroen.

nabeel mohamed wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I invested some time in going through the transaction implementation of the
> NIST stack and observed the below.
>
> The same retransmission timer logic, which is used for non-Invite client
> transaction is used for the invite retransmissions too. Hence I was able to
> observe the pattern, which I have described in my previous mail. I was able
> to change this behavior by tweaking the code a bit and things worked fine
> after that . Now, I need one clarification on this,
>
> Is it OK for the Invite client transaction to follow the same retransmission
> timer behavior as the Non-Invite client transaction. That is, instead of T1,
> 2*T1, 4*T1,.....,64*T1 it follows T1, 2*T1, ... , min( pow(2,n) * T1 , T2).
> Is it a bug ?
>
> Please correct me if i am wrong.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Nabeel
>
> On 8/31/07, nabeel mohamed <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>   
>> Hi Arif,
>>
>> Thanks for confirming that it is not the problem with the TAHI test bed. I
>> too felt the same.
>>
>> But,  am waiting to hear the observations from someone, who had tested the
>> NIST implementation of INVITE retransmissions. I feel that there are no
>> issues with the
>> configuration of the stack properties.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nabeel
>>
>> On 8/31/07, Arif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>     
>>> we are currently testing our proxy implementation with the TAHI test bed
>>> and we have not had any issue with the test bed configuration.. so i assume
>>> it must be some 'configuration' issue with ur NIST stack..
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>>
>>> arif
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers
>>> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48255/*http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/_ylc=X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsYXJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?link=list&sid=396545433>from
>>> someone who knows.
>>> Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>   


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to