Indeed thanks to Jeroen *and* Nabeel for helping fix this issue. Regards
Ranga M. Ranganathan wrote: > Thanks to Jeroen van Bemmel, I believe this problem has been resolved. > Thanks Jeroen. > > nabeel mohamed wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I invested some time in going through the transaction implementation >> of the >> NIST stack and observed the below. >> >> The same retransmission timer logic, which is used for non-Invite client >> transaction is used for the invite retransmissions too. Hence I was >> able to >> observe the pattern, which I have described in my previous mail. I >> was able >> to change this behavior by tweaking the code a bit and things worked >> fine >> after that . Now, I need one clarification on this, >> >> Is it OK for the Invite client transaction to follow the same >> retransmission >> timer behavior as the Non-Invite client transaction. That is, instead >> of T1, >> 2*T1, 4*T1,.....,64*T1 it follows T1, 2*T1, ... , min( pow(2,n) * T1 >> , T2). >> Is it a bug ? >> >> Please correct me if i am wrong. >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Nabeel >> >> On 8/31/07, nabeel mohamed <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> >>> Hi Arif, >>> >>> Thanks for confirming that it is not the problem with the TAHI test >>> bed. I >>> too felt the same. >>> >>> But, am waiting to hear the observations from someone, who had >>> tested the >>> NIST implementation of INVITE retransmissions. I feel that there are no >>> issues with the >>> configuration of the stack properties. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nabeel >>> >>> On 8/31/07, Arif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> we are currently testing our proxy implementation with the TAHI >>>> test bed >>>> and we have not had any issue with the test bed configuration.. so >>>> i assume >>>> it must be some 'configuration' issue with ur NIST stack.. >>>> >>>> regards >>>> >>>> >>>> arif >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers >>>> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48255/*http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/_ylc=X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsYXJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?link=list&sid=396545433>from >>>> >>>> >>>> someone who knows. >>>> Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. >>>> >>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip-implementors mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >> > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
