How about 480, Temporarily Unavailable, with the Warning header.
>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of KASTURI Narayanan (kasnaray) >Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 9:20 AM >To: Iñaki Baz Castillo; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Response code when MESSAGE >isstoredbecauseuser offline? > >And it will give an impression that the other user is >receiving the message but not replying back ( meaning ignoring ). > >So a message with the info indicating that the message has >been received and delivered when the user comes online is the >best option. > >Eventhoug RFC might not have specifically considered the case. > >Kasturi > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Iñaki Baz Castillo >> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:16 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Response code when MESSAGE is >> storedbecauseuser offline? >> >> On Monday 04 February 2008 14:46:24 Vikram Chhibber wrote: >> > In my opinion 202 Accepted is the best response with >Warning header >> > you can send. >> >> But that header or code description will not be shown by the human >> user since the UAC will accept that "202" as MESSAGE received by the >> UAS. >> >> -- >> Iñaki Baz Castillo >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip-implementors mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >> > >_______________________________________________ >Sip-implementors mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
