2008/7/6 Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Instead, I think the caller should be providing the calling number as an > E.164 number, when it is in fact possible to represent it that way. This > will make it universally unambiguous, and meaningful the the maximum number > of possible receiving devices. The receiving device should then take > responsibility for rendering this the receiving user in a way that is > maximally useful and friendly for the receiving user.
Hi, my first aim was this and this is what I did in outgoing calls to PSTN (I set P-Asserted-Identity as E164 complete number). But unfortunatelly it seems that common mobil phones and fixed phones render the entire number even if it's national/local, and people don't like it, the prefer to see 944990011 than +34944990011. :( Thanks a lot for your comment. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
