El Monday 07 July 2008 06:09:48 Paul Kyzivat escribió: > In the current world there has not been sufficient standardization. Or > perhaps I should say there hasn't been sufficient implementation of the > standards we have. Or maybe it is simply that the carriers have failed > to enable the implementations of the existing standards that are already > present in the equipment they have.
Or maybe there are too much MAY/SHOULD in SIP related RFC's and no fixed rules. There are so many "valid" ways to do the same that finally interoperatibility becomes chaotic since each vendor chooses its own way (even if it's sounds pesimist). > Within your domain, you can fix up however you wish. If there was wide > agreement on use of E.164, then it would be worthwhile for phones to > support it too. Then PBXs could be replaced with simply proxies. It is > not *hard* for the phone to convert to E.164 format. For any one locale > the configuration of the dial plan to do so is relatively trivial, and > not taxing on the phone to do. There just hasn't been any motivation to > do it. We'll must wait for it :) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
