Greetings,
If a UAS receives an initial INVITE with
* A Remote-Party-ID header intended to convey calling party
number (screen=off, privacy=off) - and yes, I know it's
obsolete, just ignore that for a moment...
and
* a Privacy header with a value of 'none'
... does that mean the calling party value of the RPID is going to be
ignored in favour of the default From URI user part?
RFC 3323 section 4.2 defines the value of 'none' for the header
'Privacy' and appears to imply that, but the explicit connection between
it and RPID or PAI is not made. Nevertheless, I would assume that RPID
processing falls under the heading of 'privacy-related subsystems' and
so the Privacy header would have some bearing on its treatment.
I observed a Sonus doing just that this afternoon, and I wondered if
this behaviour is correct.
Thanks!
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
