Hi!
I wonder if a RPID document without a tuple element is allowed and makes
sense.
Scenario: A presence user agent publishes a person's activities, e.g.
retrieved from a calender. If I understand it right, the tuple
represents the service. Thus, as this presence user agent does not offer
any services for communicating I think it makes sense to omit the tuple
element.
Further, accordig to RPID :
> there can be multiple elements of the same type, whose time ranges
> SHOULD NOT overlap.
Further, is it allowed to have multiple activities, ie. describing the
next activities?
Example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"
xmlns:lt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type"
xmlns:rpid="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid"
entity="pres:[email protected]">
<dm:person id="calender01">
<rpid:activities from="2010-05-30T12:00:00+02:00"
until="2010-05-30T17:00:00+02:00">
<rpid:note>SIMPLE Strategy</rpid:note>
<rpid:meeting/>
</rpid:activities>
<rpid:activities from="2010-05-30T17:00:00+02:00"
until="2010-05-30T18:00:00+02:00">
<rpid:note>jour fixe</rpid:note>
<rpid:meeting/>
</rpid:activities>
<rpid:place-type><lt:office/></rpid:place-type>
<rpid:sphere>work</rpid:sphere>
<dm:timestamp>2010-05-30T16:09:44+02:00</dm:timestamp>
</dm:person>
</presence>
Summary:
1. Is it allowed to omit the tuple element?
2. Is it fine to have multiple activities elements within a single
person element?
Thanks
Klaus
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
