2010/5/25 Klaus Darilion <[email protected]>: > 1. Is it allowed to omit the tuple element?
Yes, in fact, when using 'pidf-manipulation' XCAP application (RFC 4827) you just store <person> information via XCAP and the presence server retrieves such XML to generate the presentity. If there are not other publications for same user then the presentity will just contain a <person> section, so it's 100% valid. > 2. Is it fine to have multiple activities elements within a single > person element? It should, if not it doesn't make sense the timerange extension for rpid:activities. > 3. Is SIMPLE/XCAP a complete pain? Yes, sure, the worst design I've ever seen. All the RFC's about SIMPLE and XCAP should be killed (along with OMA/RCS layers on top of them). The specification is too wide, abstract, not efficient (communication between XCAP server and presence server???), hypercomplex (xcap-diff stuff) and provides much less than XMPP (resources concept, status priority, invisible global status...). It provides less features than MSN 8 years ago. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
