2010/5/26 Klaus Darilion <[email protected]>: >> Such field is not standarized so just a propietary implementation >> would understand the meaning you propose. > > > Sorry, it is named <class> and is already defined. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4480#section-3.3
Yes, I know that the tag <class> does exist. However its values are not standarized so my calendar SIP publisher agent could create <class>calendar</class> while your watcher expetcs <class>schedule</class>. So you just get a token (in English for all the world?), no more. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
