UAC can close down the call In this case as ideal case is UAS responds with
1600 in INVITE's 200 OK too.

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:59 PM, shyam <[email protected]> wrote:

> What should be the Final session refresh timer here?
>
> 1600 or 1800 ?
>
> The UE has changed the session-refresher timer to 1600 from initial 1800.
> But the UA is responding with 1800 as final session-expires.
> The RFC states that the final session-expires time interval can not be
> greater than the initial time interval.
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> ***********
> This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
> which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
> above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
> but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
> dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
> prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> by
> phone or email immediately and delete it!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
>  [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SIP
> Satan
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 3:44 PM
> To: Ravi Kumar
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Rfc 4028
>
> Ideal situation is UPDATE can carry same value for SE as INVITE's, Other
> option is UAS can overwrite session timer values with the latest received
> one (of  UPDATE's) and both 200 OK of UPDATE and INVITE can carry the
> updated one.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ravi Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  _____
> >
> > From: Ravi Kumar [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:27 PM
> > To: ''[email protected]'
> > Subject: Regarding Rfc 4028
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >            I have call flow Like below.
> >
> >
> >
> > UE                  UE
> >
> >
> >
> > |                     |
> >
> > --------Inv----------> (Session Expire: 1800)
> >
> > |                     |
> >
> > <----------183-----
> >
> > |                     |
> >
> > ------update------->(Session Expire: 1600)
> >
> > |                     |
> >
> > <-------200-update (Session Expire: 1600;refresher=uas)
> >
> > |                     |
> >
> > <-------200-Inv--- (Session Expire: 1800;refresher=uas)
> >
> > |                     |
> >
> >
> >
> > Doubt:
> >
> >            1. When UAC is negotiating session timer value with INVITE
> > request, and session timer negotiation is not completed then UAC should
> not
> > start negotiation with UPDATE request. Because this behavior not defined
> by
> > RFC-4028. How does other implementation handles this at UAS side.
> >
> >            And UAC should send UPDATE request with Session Expire header
> > when INVITE negotiation is not completed.
> >
> >            2. Can UPDATE request start Session timer negotiation, because
> > it is used for session timer refresher?
> >
> >            3. What does RFC-4028 last response mean?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ****************************************************************************
> > ****************************
> >  This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from
> HUAWEI,
> > which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
> > above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
> > but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
> > dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
> > prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> > by
> > phone or email immediately and delete it
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> -Satan
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>


-- 
Regards
-Satan
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to