2011/4/19 Attila Sipos <[email protected]>: > It is saying you MUST forward it. > You forward it (without creating state) to the endpoint to which you would've > forwarded a similar INVITE.
Hi Attila. As I described I do know that my proxy always behaves as a stateful proxy so forwarding a CANCEL for which there is not a server transaction will just never work in my scenario. RFC 3261 states: If a response context is not found, the element does not have any knowledge of the request to apply the CANCEL to. It MUST statelessly forward the CANCEL request (it may have statelessly forwarded the associated request previously). But this cannot be my case as my proxy neves forwards statelessly an INVITE. Then, why should it forward and unknown CANCEL? I will not do it as it's 100% useless. My question is: can the proxy reply a 481 by its own in this case? Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
