2011/5/25 Brez Borland <[email protected]>:
> True, but I though the concern originally was with stateful elements. So we
> have a ruling that stateful element must not forward unmatched responses.
> But we don't have the same ruling for the requests.

Right :)

However, even if RFC 3261 doesn't mention it, it's clear for me that
my proxy (which just works statefully) will just ignore CANCEL not
mathing a server transaction. It breaks nothing.

Regards.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to