sip-implementors  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without usingREFER method possible? - Email found in subject Johan DE CLERCQ
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without usingREFER method possible? - Email found in subject swaminathan.seetharaman
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without usingREFER method possible? - Email found in subject Vivek Batra
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without using REFER method possible? Henning Christiansen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without using REFER method possible? rohit verma
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without using REFER method possible? Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without using REFER method possible? Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without using REFER method possible? Arun Tagare
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without using REFER method possible? Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer for an attended call without using REFER method possible? Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] UE behavior on receiving a 504 ambiguous as per 3gpp RC S
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] UE behavior on receiving a 504 ambiguous as per 3gpp ankur bansal
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 5, Issue 20 Sunil P
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 5, Issue 20 Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe Message to CSCF Sunil P
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe Message to CSCF Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe Message to CSCF Raghavendra D P
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe Message to CSCF Sunil P
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe Message to CSCF Pranav Damele
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe Message to CSCF ankur bansal
• [Sip-implementors] Message Body in ACK other than SDP Prakash K
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Message Body in ACK other than SDP Neelakantan, Neel
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Message Body in ACK other than SDP Samman
• [Sip-implementors] TLS in IPv6 Jing Jiang
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] TLS in IPv6 Vadivel Subramaniam
  • [Sip-implementors] TLS in IPv6 Jing Jiang
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] TLS in IPv6 James Cloos
• [Sip-implementors] hi Poonam2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi Pranav Damele
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi Poonam2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi Pranav Damele
  • [Sip-implementors] hi Poonam2 Gupta
  • [Sip-implementors] hi Poonam2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi Pranav Damele
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi Brett Tate
  • [Sip-implementors] hi Poonam2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi Pranav Damele
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi brez
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi Pranav Damele
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi Neelakantan, Neel
• [Sip-implementors] Cancelling a request isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancelling a request Tarun2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancelling a request Rahul Pathak
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancelling a request isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancelling a request Rahul Pathak
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancelling a request Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancelling a request Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancelling a request isshed
• [Sip-implementors] <Session-Version> in SDP NK
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] <Session-Version> in SDP Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] <Session-Version> in SDP NK
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] <Session-Version> in SDP Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] <Session-Version> in SDP sampat patnaik
• [Sip-implementors] Hostnames vs IP Addresses James Cloos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Hostnames vs IP Addresses Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Hostnames vs IP Addresses James Cloos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Hostnames vs IP Addresses Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Query regarding IOI inP-Charging-Vector Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
  • [Sip-implementors] Remove my email address Siddhartha Bhakta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding IOI inP-Charging-Vector sampat patnaik
• [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Multiple 183 w/SDP along with PRACK NK
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Multiple 183 w/SDP along with PRACK Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Multiple 183 w/SDP along with PRACK NK
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Multiple 183 w/SDP along with PRACK Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Multiple 183 w/SDP along with PRACK NK
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Multiple 183 w/SDP along with PRACK Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Multiple 183 w/SDP along with PRACK NK
• [Sip-implementors] How to implement load balancing through RFC 2782 Pankaj Choudhary
• [Sip-implementors] Securing the exchange of keys in SDP Eugene Christensen
• [Sip-implementors] Tel URI having escape sequence in it Jatin Kohli
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Tel URI having escape sequence in it Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] When local Min-SE is greater than remote Min-SE Tarun2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] When local Min-SE is greater than remote Min-SE Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] 3rd party AS simulators Tarun2 Gupta
• [Sip-implementors] Reminder : Details for SIPit 31 Robert Sparks
• [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Rajesh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Joel Gerber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header swaminathan.seetharaman
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Rajesh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Rajesh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Joel Gerber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] Difference Between SIP registration & reregistration Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Difference Between SIP registration & reregistration Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Difference Between SIP registration & reregistration Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Difference Between SIP registration & reregistration Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] FROM Header Query NK
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] FROM Header Query Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] SIP Media Loopback call-flows. Madhav Bhamidipati
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Media Loopback call-flows. Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Media Loopback call-flows. Rahul Pathak
• [Sip-implementors] Question about B2BUA and 200OK onewhoknows
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about B2BUA and 200OK Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about B2BUA and 200OK onewhoknows
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about B2BUA and 200OK Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] A Question about INVITE Server Transaction in RFC 6026 Caixia Liu
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A Question about INVITE Server Transaction in RFC 6026 Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A Question about INVITE Server Transaction in RFC 6026 Caixia Liu
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A Question about INVITE Server Transaction in RFC 6026 Roman Shpount
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A Question about INVITE Server Transaction in RFC 6026 Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A Question about INVITE Server Transaction in RFC 6026 Roman Shpount
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A Question about INVITE Server Transaction in RFC 6026 Caixia Liu
• [Sip-implementors] maddr in 3xx Contact Thomas Paul
  • [Sip-implementors] maddr in 3xx Contact Thomas Paul
• [Sip-implementors] SIP NATing Voipper
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP NATing Moises Silva
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP NATing jayantheesh
• [Sip-implementors] Enconding of Callee Capabilities Priority feature-tag as string och numeric bnf-construct Taisto Qvist
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Enconding of Callee Capabilities Priority feature-tag as string och numeric bnf-construct Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Validation of Alert-Info header value Pramida Tumma
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Validation of Alert-Info header value Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Validation of Alert-Info header value Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] REGISTER method is dialog oriented? Manu Gowdru
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER method is dialog oriented? Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER method is dialog oriented? Manu Gowdru
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER method is dialog oriented? Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER method is dialog oriented? Manu Gowdru
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER method is dialog oriented? Alex Balashov
• [Sip-implementors] Early Dialog Termination Anurag Chaudhry
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Dialog Termination Vivek Talwar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Dialog Termination ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Dialog Termination Tarun2 Gupta
• [Sip-implementors] remove me kksu...@kmitl.ac.th
• [Sip-implementors] rinstance in contact Jing Jiang
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] rinstance in contact Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] Empty P-Asserted-Identity Header Ozdogru, Kutay
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Empty P-Asserted-Identity Header swaminathan.seetharaman
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Empty P-Asserted-Identity Header Mustafa AYDIN
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Empty P-Asserted-Identity Header Mustafa AYDIN
• [Sip-implementors] RTP start time in case of PRACK Rajesh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP start time in case of PRACK Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP start time in case of PRACK Rajesh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP start time in case of PRACK Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] remove me Prarthana Ravi Kumar
• [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly Sander Rambags
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly Vivek Batra
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly Sander Rambags
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Proxy-Authenticate Header jaytestimap
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Proxy-Authenticate Header Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] Recall: unsubscribe Ariel Arad
• [Sip-implementors] unsubscribe Ariel Arad
  • [Sip-implementors] Unsubscribe Illescas Rodriguez, Guillermina
• [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP VARUN BHATIA
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP VARUN BHATIA
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] TCP/NAT handling in SIP Varun Bhatia
• [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag SIP Learner
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag Tom Lake
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag SIP Learner
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag SIP Learner
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] more 404-Not Found calls Mahudeswaran A
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] more 404-Not Found calls Daniel Pagan
• Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] PRACK Messages after the 180 Stephen James
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] PRACK Messages after the 180 qcorba
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] PRACK Messages after the 180 Jose Alberto Berroteran
• [Sip-implementors] PRACK Messages after the 180 Zuñiga , Guillermo
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK Messages after the 180 Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] Transport Selection dependent on message size and NAPTR priorities (pitting rfc3261 vs rfc3263) Taisto Qvist
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Transport Selection dependent on message size and NAPTR priorities (pitting rfc3261 vs rfc3263) Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Transport Selection dependent on message size and NAPTR priorities (pitting rfc3261 vs rfc3263) Taisto Qvist
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Transport Selection dependent on message size and NAPTR priorities (pitting rfc3261 vs rfc3263) Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Transport Selection dependent on message size and NAPTR priorities (pitting rfc3261 vs rfc3263) Taisto Qvist
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Transport Selection dependent on message size and NAPTR priorities (pitting rfc3261 vs rfc3263) Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] Dialog matching isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Dialog matching Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Dialog matching isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Dialog matching Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Dialog matching isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Dialog matching isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Dialog matching Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] Help: Initial REG on NOTIFY terminate Raghu
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Help: Initial REG on NOTIFY terminate Praveena Ss
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Help: Initial REG on NOTIFY terminate ankur bansal
• [Sip-implementors] Reg. CFNR swaminathan.seetharaman
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Reg. CFNR Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Reg. CFNR swaminathan.seetharaman
• [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission Aditya Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission Aditya Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission Aditya Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission ankur bansal
  • [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission onewhoknows
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission Dale R. Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Register implementation Aditya Kumar
• [Sip-implementors] Regarding crypto parameters in offer/answer Kashif Husain
• [Sip-implementors] Parser for ISUP body contained in SIP message Preksha Gupta
• [Sip-implementors] Multiple 200 OK responses processing VARUN BHATIA

• Earlier messages
• Later messages