Robert Sparks writes: > I also think you and dean (at least) have been talking past each > other. There is no prohibition in 3261 against a proxy adding more than > one RR value. And there is definitely nothing from the vantage point > of elements on either side that would break if it did so (assuming it > put appropriate values in of course).
fine, we can then put this discussion into rest (assuming that someone does not try to in some later document to prohibit double r-r'ing). -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
