On Apr 27, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
I agree fully that the text is confusing. That's why we've got such
a rat's nest of threads around this. Thomas' draft is trying to
make it better.
I also think you and dean (at least) have been talking past each
other. There is no prohibition in 3261 against a proxy adding more
than
one RR value. And there is definitely nothing from the vantage
point of elements on either side that would break if it did so
(assuming it
put appropriate values in of course).
Right, I've been trying to say double recording is a better solution
than rewriting, because rewriting is likely to break stuff, and we
haven't found anything that breaks from double recording. That's the
argument for deprecating (at least to a SHOULD level rather than
prohibiting) rewriting.
I'm not suggesting we prohibit double recording.
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
