>-----Original Message----- >From: ext Volker Hilt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 13.06.2007 17:21 >To: Veikkolainen Simo (NSN - FI/Helsinki) >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01 > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi, >> I have a couple of comments/questions on this draft. >> >> 3.2 Policy subscription >> The MIME type defined in this draft for session-independent policies >> is application/session-policy+xml. It is mentioned that "a UA >> compliant to this specification MUST support the User Agent Profile >> Data Set for Media Policy", which (version -04) seems to define MIME >> type application/media-policy-dataset+xml. I guess the MIME types >> should be the same? >> >Good catch. I'll change the MIME type in the framework to >application/media-policy-dataset+xml. > >> 4.2 Overview, last sentence >> It is said that "Both types of policies [applying to the offer, or >> both to the offer and answer] are supported by >session-specific policy >> mechanism." Does this require a mechanism to indicate in the policy >> whether the policy applies to offer, or both offer and answer? With >> this kind of mechanism the endpoint would not have to >request a policy >> decision for the answer, if the policy applies only to the offer. >> >Yes. The policy event package supports this.
Ah, this would be the "local-only" event parameter, I guess? This is fine then. -Simo > >> 4.3.1 Offer in request, example on page 12 What should be the >> behaviour if the policy check at the end (messaages 9 and >10) indicate >> that the policy was unacceptable? Should there be a re-INVITE or >> UPDATE, possible triggering a similar policy checking again in the >> remote end? Would it be better to always wait for the policy >decision >> before answering with the final response? >> >I think it is unlikely that a policy server would decline a >session at this point since it has accepted the offer earlier. >If it does occur, the correct behavior for the UA would be to >terminate the session by sending a BYE. I believe section >4.4.6. covers this to some extend but maybe this needs to be >made more explicit. > >Volker > > > > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ext DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: 22.05.2007 01:06 >>> To: IETF SIP List >>> Subject: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01 >>> >>> (As WG chair) >>> >>> This is to announce a Working Group Last Call on >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-session-poli >>> cy-framew >>> ork-01.txt >>> >>> The WGLC is for 3 weeks and will end on 11th June 2007. >>> >>> Please respond to the editor, and to the SIP mailing list with >>> comments. >>> >>> This WGLC is being held in conjunction with the two related >documents >>> in the SIPPING group, see mail below: >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Keith >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> --------- >>> ----------------------------- >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is to announce Working Group Last Call on the >following documents: >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-media-po >>> licy-data >>> set-04.txt (Recently updated to address the merging issue >discussed >>> on the mailing list) >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-policy-p >>> ackage-03 >>> .txt (Unchanged since prior to IETF-68) >>> >>> This WGLC will end on 11 June 2007. >>> >>> Since the WG has previously reviewed these documents, the >plan is to >>> keep the same set of reviewers that previously volunteered: >>> Bob Penfield, Shida Schubert, Flemming Andreasen, Roni Even >>> However, anyone additional that would like to volunteer would be >>> appreciated to get a fresh set of eyes on the document. >>> >>> Feedback should be sent to the authors' email addresses (which is >>> cc'ed using the tools alias in the above for your >>> convenience) and please copy the SIPPING mailing list. >>> >>> Note: the original plan was to WGLC this set of documents >along with >>> the framework document that moved to SIP. So, stay tuned for an >>> announcement on the SIP list of the WGLC plans for that document. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mary >>> SIPPING WG co-chair >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> --------- >>> ------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >>> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
