Mary,
thanks much for reviewing this document. I've fixed all the nits you
have identified. Thanks much!
Volker
Mary Barnes wrote:
Draft: draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01
Reviewer: Mary Barnes
Review Date: 8 June 2007
Review Deadline: 11 June 2007
Status: WGLC
Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits
that should be fixed before publication.
Comments:
----------
I reviewed the diff for this document as compared to the version
I previously reviewed:
http://www.softarmor.com/sipping/process/wg-review/reviews/draft-ietf-si
pping-session-policy-framework-01-barnes.txt
And, I believe all my previous concerns have been addressed. There are
a
few nits that I noticed that should be fixed.
Nits:
------
- Header: Need to add "Intended Status:" (i.e., category="std" in the
<rfc> field)
- Section 4.4.1:
- 2nd paragraph, 5th sentence: insert "the" between "using" and
"mechanism" in the following sentence:
"If the UAC decides to continue, it MUST use the policy server
URI to contact the policy server using the mechanism defined in
Section 4.5."
- 2nd paragraph, 8th sentence: "resend" -> "resent" in the following
sentence:
"If no changes are required by policies or no policies have
been received, the request can be resend without any policy-induced
changes."
--
Volker Hilt Bell Labs / Alcatel-Lucent
phone: +1 732 888 7206 791 Holmdel-Keyport Rd
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Holmdel, NJ 07733
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
