Agreed.

For what it's worth, I see the same thing in the Enteprise space where
there is a move to mapping and native SIP, away from various
"tunnelling"
techniques.

Tunnelling is sooooo 1998 :^)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry Sinnreich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:37
> To: Rafferty, James; Eric Burger; Bram Verburg
> Cc: sip
> Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO - more on SIP-T
> 
> James,
> 
> Thanks for the useful data.
> 
> > We see more of the SS7 to SIP mapping than the use of SIP-T these
> days.
> 
> This makes sense since given the large number of SS7 
> variants; it is a flexible solution that keeps the SS7 
> variant complexity at the edge of the IP network.
> 
> SIP-T for bridging applications would probably make sense in 
> a homogeneous network, but given the almost weekly merger and 
> acquisition stories and the probably 100 SS7 variants, this 
> does not seem a flexible solution without some SS7-SS7 
> converters at some endpoints :-)
> 
> SIP in the middle is indeed the best choice.
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Thanks again, Henry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafferty, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 10:00 AM
> To: Henry Sinnreich; Eric Burger; Bram Verburg
> Cc: sip
> Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO - more on SIP-T
> 
> Henry, 
> 
> Our company can either map SS7 to SIP, or use SIP-T in our gateways.
> The main reason to use SIP-T (or what the ITU-T/3GPP calls 
> SIP-I) is to more completely preserve the SS7 parameter 
> information for SS7 bridging applications.  If the desire is 
> to cut over completely to SIP, then the direct mapping 
> approach works, but much of the SS7 semantics are lost.
> We see more of the SS7 to SIP mapping than the use of SIP-T 
> these days.


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to