Hi, >>I haven't thought about this proposal in detail yet, but we would also
>>need to take the the dialog-reuse spec (which proposes NOT to mix >>dialog usages) into consideration. But, if we somehow could bind the >>subscription lifetime to the dialog lifetime I think that at least >>some of the issues in that spec would be solved. > >The lifetime of a dialog isn't an independent variable - it >ends when the last dialog usage ends. > >If you are really talking about implicit *subscriptions*, >then you either must explicitly end them, or else define >their *implicit* end in terms of something that has an >explicit endpoint. > >I expect that you are talking about something that either >shares the invite dialog usage, or else a distinct dialog >usage that implicitly starts and stops concurrently with the >invite dialog usage. Yes. I'd like to call it "invite dialog subscriptions", or something like that... Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
