On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Dean Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mar 13, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Dwight, Timothy M (Tim) wrote: > > > I don't understand the focus on PSTN gateways. Is it believed that > > only > > PSTN gateways ever create URIs with numeric user parts? Or that PSTN > > gateways are particularly untrustworthy? Neither seems reasonable to > > me. > > Here's the good news. Sine there are very few (aka none) > implementations of RFC 4474 in the field now, we might be able to > argue that by providing a way to properly handle PSTN numbers at > gateways BEFORE we get deployment lets us work around the problem. > Forgot to post this last week. The resiprocate (open source) sip stack has supported RFC 4474 for several years now and has been deployed in a number of commercial products including user agents, proxies and b2buas.
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
