On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Hisham Khartabil wrote:
Having looked at the agenda, I think we can do without the 2nd
session. What I mean is that we can remove presentations from the
1st session that we don't think need face time (Robert pointed at a
couple) and move the ones requiring face time from the 2nd session
to the 1st.
Well, I have to say I based the invfix and steps-to-draft times on
Robert's request from last week, so I'm surprised but not unhappy
about the suggestion to nuke them.
I did not offer to remove steps-to-draft - we do need face time on that.
And I mentioned when I scheduled invfix that we could pull it if there
were no comments before the meeting.
I don't think we need 10 mins to bash the agenda.
Keith and I discussed that. I suggested 5. He pointed out that for
the last 10 meetings or so, every time we've said 5 we've used 15.
I also don't think we need 10mins for draft-ietf-sip-saml-04. We
can limit face time to drafts that have open issues to discuss that
were not resolveable on the list.
Here's the open issue with SAML. Are we actually going to do
anything with it? The two people who seem to care about the draft
have worked at it steadily. Does it have any meaning to the rest of
us? Should we publish it? Maybe as experimental?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
