On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
I also don't think we need 10mins for
draft-ietf-sip-saml-04. We can
limit face time to drafts that have open issues to discuss
that were
not resolveable on the list.
I also do not think we need to discuss the document during the
meeting.
There are open issues but they are mostly technical in nature and I
don't expect a lot of feedback on these issues during a face-to-face
discussion with a 10 min slot.
My impression at previous SIP meetings was that there is not enough
time
for some discussions related to the overall direction of the work.
Many
of the detailed discussions on drafts, where often only 5 folks know
the
subject well enough or care about it enough to join the discussion,
are
not really well-spent time given the larger number of folks in the
meeting room.
So here are the questions:
1) Are we getting anywhere, as a WG, with SAML?
2) Is there some other process we should be using that would be more
effective, such as a) a design team leading to AD-sponsored individual
or experimental draft, b) a dedicated working group on identity issues
such as I have proposed?
3) Does the work NEED to be done at all in the IETF? Is there a
constituency of implementation, or are we engaging in a purely
academic exercise? Perhaps academic publication would be a more
appropriate direction if we lack a constituency.
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
