Hi, >>Can I ask you, why would you want to use Outbound in you want forking to occur? > >now that outbound text has been changed and it mandates UA to register via two ob proxies if only two is given, it allows >a very simple implementation of redundancy, because the two proxies can operate totally independent of each other.
That still dooesn't answer my question: why do you want forking? Why can't the registrar simply choose ONE working flow? And, the UA can make normal (non-outbound) registrations via each of the two ob proxies. They will still operate indepenent of each other - and you will get forking. >if UA has two different contacts and if outbound i-d does not mandate the UA to register BOTH of them with BOTH ob >proxies, then the above (and only benefit) of outbound i-d goes away again, because we would again be in the situation >-where redundancy is lost. Even the UA has two contacts, and registers each once (using normal reg procedures), you will still have redundancy: if one contact doesn't work then the registrar will try anohter. Regards, Christer -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
