Hi, > So, you want to register both contacts to both registars, right? > > Example: > > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1 > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_1 ----- REG_2 > UA_Contact_3g ----- OB_2 ----- REG_1 > UA_Contact_3g ----- OB_2 ----- REG_2
>no, like this: > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1 > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_2 ----- REG_2 > UA_Contact_3g ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1 > UA_Contact_3g ----- OB_2 ----- REG_2 Now, in your example, if OB_1 and REG_2 fail you don't still don't have redundancy :) >if outbound does not mandate that UA must register each contact with both ob proxies, my pleasant surprise was a too >early one and ob draft falls back to the useless bin. I don't have the spec in front of me, but I don't think it currently talks about multiple contacts. I guess this all comes back to Dean's question whether we need some new text into the draft. In order to avoid delaying the Outbound spec even more, I guess it could also be an extension draft:"Outbound with multiple contacts", or something like that... Regards, Christer -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
