Cullen, What do you mean by "not yet a WG draft"? Didn't it become the WG draft May 2008 to address the WG chartered item: "Termination of early dialog prior to final response"?
The status within the charter appears to indicate that the WGLC is already "Done". :) Other than maybe delaying until there are more implementations, is there a reason to delay the WGLC? I doubt delaying the WGLC would get any of the non interested participants to provide comments; however a WGLC might finally get them to send comments other than indicate that they are not interested in completing the draft unless it also solves HERFP. Thanks, Brett > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Cullen Jennings > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 4:43 PM > To: Christer Holmberg > Cc: [email protected]; Keith Drage; Dean Willis > Subject: Re: [Sip] New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC? > > > I'm looking at this and it seems to me this is not yet a WG draft - A > WGLC might be a bit premature. > > > On Feb 19, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I've submitted a new version of draft-ietf-sip-199. I have done > > changes and updates based on feedback and discussions (please let me > > know if you think I've forgotten something), and I've also added > > text to the security chapter. > > > > I propose that we start the WGLC process for the draft. > > > > The draft can also be found at: > > > > http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-05.txt > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
