Brett, you are right - I just totally messed this one up and missed it when I went looking. My apologies - I was just trying to clean up too many emails too quickly. Please ignore my previous email and finish this WG draft really soon :-)

Sorry, Cullen


On Feb 22, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Brett Tate wrote:

Cullen,

What do you mean by "not yet a WG draft"? Didn't it become the WG draft May 2008 to address the WG chartered item: "Termination of early dialog prior to final response"?

The status within the charter appears to indicate that the WGLC is already "Done". :)

Other than maybe delaying until there are more implementations, is there a reason to delay the WGLC? I doubt delaying the WGLC would get any of the non interested participants to provide comments; however a WGLC might finally get them to send comments other than indicate that they are not interested in completing the draft unless it also solves HERFP.

Thanks,
Brett

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Cullen Jennings
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 4:43 PM
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc: [email protected]; Keith Drage; Dean Willis
Subject: Re: [Sip] New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?


I'm looking at this and it seems to me this is not yet a WG draft - A
WGLC might be a bit premature.


On Feb 19, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:


Hi,

I've submitted a new version of draft-ietf-sip-199. I have done
changes and updates based on feedback and discussions (please let me
know if you think I've forgotten something), and I've also added
text to the security chapter.

I propose that we start the WGLC process for the draft.

The draft can also be found at:

http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-05.txt

Regards,

Christer


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to