Dean Willis wrote:
We didn't get any real answers due to a bit of confusion between this
and keepalive. So, let's ask the question again.
Is 199 ready for WGLC?
Yes; it is well written (I had looked at a much earlier version
and just re-read -06.)
One question for Christer:
- Does 199 carry a message/sipfrag MIME type that conveys the
nature of the final non-2xx response? This may have been
discussed in the past, and if so, please let me know. I
do note that rfc3420 is specified in the draft as a normative
reference, but it is not referred to anywhere in the body
of the draft.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
