> -----Original Message----- > From: Francois Audet [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:53 PM > To: Jonathan Rosenberg; Jiri Kuthan; Dan WING > Cc: SIP IETF; Uzelac, Adam; Dean Willis > Subject: Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not > used in the field > > For everybody's reference, can you point to Dan's draft?
It is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-sip-identity-media-02 other proposals in the same sphere, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fischer-sip-e2e-sec-media-00 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaplan-sip-asserter-identity-01 -d > On Mar30 2009 19:12 , "Jonathan Rosenberg" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > inline: > > > > Jiri Kuthan wrote: > > > > > >>> From an end user perspective, I would assert that the > most important > >>> thing is probably the media. If the callerID says, "this > is bob", what > >>> is important to the user, is that when I pick up the > phone and start > >>> talking, it will be Bob who hears me, and Bob that I hear. > >>> > >>> Consider this litmus test: > >>> > >>> If the signaling actually came from Mary (perhaps as a > third party), > >>> but the media goes/comes to/from Bob, who should appear > on the caller > >>> ID? I say - Bob. > >> > >> There is a timing aspect in favor of placing identity in > signaling -- > >> I would like to know whose call is ringing before I answer > (if I do). > > > > You can still have that. Just don't ring the phone until > early media has > > been exchanged and verified. Indeed if you were doing an > ICE-style thing > > per Dan's draft, you'd get that for free. > > > > -Jonathan R. > > > > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
