> -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Willis [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:43 PM > To: Hadriel Kaplan > > On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:02 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > > Well, for one, you can get identity in signaling and identity in > > media using DTLS/SRTP *without* using RFC-4474 as currently > > defined. We're trying to get it to NOT protect things that don't > > need to be protected for identity to be attained. > > umm, I believe RFC 4474 is what correlates the identity-in-media with > the identity-in-signaling. The media identity expression is not > particularly useful without its correlation to signaling and thence to > a "human readable" identity expression.
Right, sorry I should have been clearer. You had said: > That's what we get with RFC 4474 and DTLS/SRTP. > Why were we trying to change it to protect something else? I meant we don't have to use 4474 in particular to accomplish the same goal - for example, any one of the other proposals thus far provide you that same binding. Just because 4474 gets you that binding, doesn't mean another mechanism can't, nor that changing what 4474 protects removes that binding. We're trying to protect only what actually needs to be protected to get you that binding. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
