Thanks Spencer and Attila! I'll fix the flows. Regards, Christer ________________________________
From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:38 PM To: Attila Sipos; Francois Audet; Christer Holmberg; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 I apologize for this post in advance (lowest added value post to this mailing list in some time), but http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor/instructions2authors.txt says B. Basic Formatting | 3.1 | o Only printable ASCII characters | 3.1(1), | 3.1(4) o No lines exceeding 72 characters | 3.1(2) [This is especially important for "as is" tables | and figures, which cannot be easily reformatted by| the RFC Editor.] Thanks, Spencer ----- Original Message ----- From: Attila Sipos <mailto:[email protected]> To: Francois Audet <mailto:[email protected]> ; Christer Holmberg <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:16 PM Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 Francois' comment about the diagram also brought to my attention the fact that figure 3 is probably "illegal" for RFCs - isn't there usually an 80 character line-length limit? Anyway, I've "re-drawn" figure 3 and removed the word "leg" - this can obviously be made clear with an explanation. UAC P1 P2 UAS_2 UAS_3 UAS_4 --- INVITE---> --- INVITE (2) -------------------> --- INVITE -----> --- INVITE (3) ------------> --- INVITE (4) ---------------------> <-- 18x (3) ---------------- <-- 18x (3) ----- <-- 18x (3) -- <-- 18x (4) ------------------------- <-- 18x (4) ----- <-- 18x (4) -- <-- 4xx (3) ---------------- --- ACK (3) ---------------> <-- 4xx (4) ------------------------- --- ACK (4) ------------------------> <-- 4xx (3) ---- --- ACK (3) ---> <-- 199 (3) -- <-- 199 (4) -- <-- 200 (2) ---------------------- <-- 200 (2) -- --- ACK (2) -> --- ACK (2) ---------------------> Only issue now is that this makes figure 3 inconsistent with the others. ________________________________ From: [email protected] on behalf of Francois Audet Sent: Tue 07/04/2009 18:16 To: Christer Holmberg; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 Minor comment: It would improve readability of the Figures if the vertical bars where ] included in the pictures. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 00:31 To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07 Hi, I have put together a new version (-07) of the 199 draft, based on the latest discussions. The changes are in chapters 5 (new note added) and 6 (text simplified). 100rel and SDP o/a impacts have also been added to chapters 5 and 6 (I have still kept chapters 9 and 10, though). http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt> Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip . ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
