Francois' comment about the diagram
also brought to my attention the fact that figure 3
is probably "illegal" for RFCs - isn't there usually
an 80 character line-length limit?
 
Anyway, I've "re-drawn" figure 3 and removed
the word "leg" - this can obviously be made
clear with an explanation.
 
   UAC           P1               P2               UAS_2     UAS_3    UAS_4
    --- INVITE--->
                  --- INVITE (2) ------------------->
                  --- INVITE ----->
                                   --- INVITE (3) ------------>
                                   --- INVITE (4) --------------------->
                                   <-- 18x (3) ----------------
                  <-- 18x (3) -----
    <-- 18x (3) --
                                   <-- 18x (4) -------------------------
                  <-- 18x (4) -----
    <-- 18x (4) --
                                   <-- 4xx (3) ----------------
                                   --- ACK (3) --------------->
                                   <-- 4xx (4) -------------------------
                                   --- ACK (4) ------------------------>
                  <-- 4xx (3) ----
                  --- ACK (3) --->
    <-- 199 (3) --
    <-- 199 (4) --
                  <-- 200 (2) ----------------------
    <-- 200 (2) --
    --- ACK (2) ->
                  --- ACK (2) --------------------->

Only issue now is that this makes figure 3 inconsistent with the others.
 
 
 

________________________________

From: [email protected] on behalf of Francois Audet
Sent: Tue 07/04/2009 18:16
To: Christer Holmberg; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07



Minor comment: It would improve readability of the Figures if the vertical bars 
where ]
included in the pictures.


________________________________

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Christer Holmberg
        Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 00:31
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07
       
       


        Hi,

        I have put together a new version (-07) of the 199 draft, based on the 
latest discussions.

        The changes are in chapters 5 (new note added) and 6 (text simplified). 
100rel and SDP o/a impacts have also been added to chapters 5 and 6 (I have 
still kept chapters 9 and 10, though).

        http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt 
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt> 

        Regards,

        Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to