Dan Wing wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Roach [mailto:[email protected]]
...
Dan Wing wrote:

        On SIP networks today we have intermediaries modifying
SDP in transit.  It's
        happening now, on real networks.  I am really
interested in preserving
        identity over those networks.

...

I think it's important to distinguish among three classes of
solutions in this space:

1.      Identity that works through existing B2BUAs
2.      Identity that might not work through existing B2BUAs,
but that B2BUAs can be modified to work with
3.      Identity that precludes the presence of B2BUAs

...

At the risk of suggesting compromise, I'll point out that
there *is* a way to mutually satisfy those people who reject
solutions in class #1 and those people who reject solutions
in class #3. I suspect that useful progress lies in that
direction only.

Agreed.  And I also prefer #2.


Ah, I misunderstood your earlier statement -- "I am really interested in preserving identity over [SIP networks today with intermediaries that modify SDP in transit]" -- to mean that the intermediaries were not to be modified. So we're really both talking about SIP networks for some upcoming tomorrow, not SIP networks today.

Good. I think that leaves a lot of common ground to work with.

/a
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to