On Aug 19, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Dale Worley wrote:

> I'd like to get Java compatibility straightened out.
>
> The currently built RPMs have a 'require' for Java version >= 1.6.   
> The
> currently distributed RPM set contains such a Java RPM.
>
> However, this could force a Java upgrade on some users, as earlier
> versions of sipX only require Java version >= 1.5.
>
> I looked at the discussions of this issue on sipx-dev.  The last  
> thread
> I found starts at
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/msg12614.html  One or two
> people suggested we push users to upgrade to Java 1.6.  Damien noted
> that we previously stated on sipx-dev
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/9437) that there
> would be one more version ("3.12", now called 4.0) that would be
> compatible with 1.5.  There seemed to be no compelling reasons not to
> follow this path, and that pretty much ended the discussion.
>
> So we are now in a state where the code is not compatible with the
> discussions on sipx-dev.  I'd like to get this conflict resolved.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Dale
>
>

Why do you believe that there is a conflict?  Our code will compile  
and run perfectly well on J5.  As for the RPM's requiring J6, that is  
a totally different matter.  Since 4.0 will ship with J6, the PRM's  
call out that version.  This will ensure that consistency will be  
maintained in regards to JVM versions regardless of wether or not the  
installation was a clean install or an upgrade.

-Mardy

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to