Joe Attardi wrote: > Dale Worley wrote: > > There is a downside (however small) in pushing people to Java 1.6 if we > > said we wouldn't do that for this version. > > What I'd like to add to this discussion... what is the harm in pushing > people to Java 1.6? Java 1.5 has been in its Java Technology End of Life > (EOL) transition period since April, and will reach its EOL next > October. Still over a year away, but why the hesitation? Java 1.6 has > been widely available for all the supported platforms for well over a > year now. >
This is what sipXconfig is doing: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/9437 The discussion that we have here is not if we are going to be 1.5 compatible in the next release: we will be (I should say sipXconfig will be) The issue at hand is: are we going to force upgrade to 1.6 by manipulating the "Required" statement of the RPM spec file. I am against it, but I'll live. D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
