> >Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Question about XECS-1610 > >Woof! > >On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:45:19 -0400, Tony Graziano ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Many thanks. We are exploring the feasibility of writing a gateway to >> emulate a POP3 and/or IMAP4 connection to VM (hence unified messaging >> for any platform) > >Ah, the holy grail of UM. Good luck. > >If you solve the "message waiting indicator" problem, let us know. That >is, when the user access the mailstore via IMAP, they expect the MWI >indicator to be reset as quickly as it does when accessed via the TUI or >Web. > > >--Woof!
I don't think that MWI is a major concern anymore. The request we get most often is to be able to delete messages only once. A delay on the MWI side seems to be perfectly acceptable to users who value a fully unified messaging experience. Also, the ability to use existing backup mechanism for the company's mailstore to now also backup voicemail is a big advantage. --martin _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
