On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Scott Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 09:07 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Robert Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Steinmann, Martin (BL60:2500) >> >> >> >> Does the new remote worker / NAT traversal feature support >> >> video as e.g. provided by the Counterpath softphones? >> > >> > Yes it does handle traversal for both audio and video streams (and in >> > any combination, i.e. Audio-only, Audio+Video and Video-only). >> >> >> Unless there is demand for it ( i.e. say now if you feel this is a >> limitation), the first release of sipxbridge will handle only audio >> streams as the use case is primarily PSTN connectivity. Video stream >> support will be added in subsequent releases. If an Audio + video >> call is made through sipxbridge, only the audio portion of the all >> setup will be handled. > > The reason for this is that sipXbridge is targeted to supporting > connections to ITSPs - PSTN connectivity through a remote service > provider. > > I'm not aware of anyone offering an ITSP service that includes video > (would love to hear about any and what standards they support).
There could be a use case for this ( not sure how compelling it is). Consider that you are making a call from a SIP video phone via an ITSP to a second PBX where the DID of the inbound call is mapped to another video phone. It would be nice if this case could work in a future release. For now, I will deal with a single voice sdp media description per call -- which should cover all PSTN interactions. Ranga > > Note that with the NAT traversal feature, video should work for any > all-SIP call. > > > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
