On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Robert Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Worley, Dale (BL60:9D30) >> >> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:44 -0400, Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30) wrote: >> > > Worley, Dale (BL60:9D30) >> > > >> > > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 15:05 +0000, Scott Lawrence wrote: >> > > > Note that with the NAT traversal feature, video should work for >> > > > any all-SIP call. >> > > >> > > That is, any all-SIP call that doesn't require media bridging. >> > >> > Can you be more specific about what you mean by media bridging? >> >> Where the media goes through sipXrelay. > > The NAT traversal feature will do NAT compensation for all-SIP calls for > both the audio and video sessions. For example, if you have a sipXecs > and softclient 'A' deployed behind a NAT and softclient 'B' deployed > behind a remote NAT. Suppose that 'A' and 'B' are both registered > against sipXecs then 'A' and 'B' will be able to have full audio+video > (as well as IM, but that's not really media) across the NATs. The NAT > Traversal feature will allocate a Media Relay session for each media > session type on the sipXrelay.
You may also want to include fax in case remote workers want to send fax to to each other. Ranga > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
