Woof! On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:58:09 -0400, Beeton, Carolyn (CAR:9D60) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is what mrtg does; Yes. > we're already using it; No. It's an optional componant. It's optional because there is a large performance penalty for running it (the mrtg JPG generating parts, not the snmp parts). It isn't recommended for small underpowered systems (Pingtel's existing hardware base, for example). > why not take advantage of its threshold monitoring as well? Because it's overkill, and relies on an optional componant. --Woof! _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
