On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 17:57 -0500, M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Woof! > > > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:26:05 -0500, M. Ranganathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> How do I know it is a session timer and not a > >> re-negotiation attempt with the ITSP? > > > > Version number in the SDP field not NOT be incremented. (I think.) > > > > > > --Woof! > > > > I was afraid you might say that. I just hope ALL endpoints are well > behaved in that respect and are careful about updating session version > number for codec renegotiation. FWIW I have come across only one > obsolete endpoint that does not like in-dialog OPTIONS -- obsolete > FSX 104. Any others?
The problem wouldn't be that the endpoint doesn't like in-dialog OPTIONS. The problem would be that the endpoint doesn't distinguish between in- and out-of dialog. It needs to send 4xx for an in-dialog OPTIONS when the dialog doesn't exist. -ke _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
