Consider 2 scenarios :
 Scenraio1 :When phone 145 has voicemail permission.

1)Register 3 phones 145,146,147.
2)Set user call forwarding for 145 such that:"at same time" forward to 
147 ring for 30 seconds.Click on apply.
3)Default serial fork expiration = 20 sec
4)From 146, dial 145. Do not answer the call.
  Here Phone 145 and 147 start ringing simultaneously ("at the same 
time").Phone 145 rings for a total of 20 seconds (Default serial fork 
expiration) and stops, 147  rings for a total of 30 seconds, the call 
then rolls to the voicemail of phone 145.

The 302 moved temporarily shows the following:
Contact: 
<sip:[email protected];x-sipX-nonat?ROUTE=%3Csip%3A176.25.10.204%3A5060%3Blr%3E>
Contact:<sip:[email protected];sipx-noroute=Voicemail?expires=30&X-sipX-Authidentity=%3Csip%3A145%40mercury.qantom.int%
3Bsignature%3D49B743DD%253Aa8b9c3a0787681a6b4391389af4b25cf%3E&ROUTE=%3Csip%3A176.25.10.204%3A5060%3Blr%3E>;q=1.0
Contact: 
<sip:[email protected]?route=%3csip%3a176.25.10.204%3a5060%3blr%3e>;q=0.1

The above scenario works correctly.The expected behavior required is for 
the scenario when 145 does not have voicemail permission as mentioned below.
Scenario 2: When 145 DOES NOT have voicemail permission.

 Steps:
1)Set user call forwarding for 145 such that:  "at same time" forward to 
147 ring for 30 seconds.Click on apply.
2)Default serial fork expiration = 20 sec
3)From 146, dial 145. Do not answer the call.
Here phone 145 and 147 start ringing simultaneously ("at the same time") 
But Phone 145 rings for a total of 60 seconds. (is this the right 
behavior?) 147 rings for a total of 30 seconds, upon no answer the call 
gets disconnected on the caller.

Should 145 ring for 60 seconds, since it does not have voicemail 
permissions ? Is this the right behavior?
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to