Paul Mossman wrote: >> Any objections to an Improvement JIRA for this? Thanks. > > There were no objections, so I raised: > > XCF-3581: Send Emergency Dial Rule calls via sipXproxy by default > (change profile generation) >
Sorry I missed it yesterday but opening an issues is probably premature. You do need to give people more time to raise objections. > > Note though that this issue is related to: > > XCF-3575: Invalid LG-Nortel config file generated when Emergency Dial > Rule is enabled > > This error actually allows LG-Nortels to trigger the new Alarm > notification behaviour. > > Damian, you recently set the XCF-3575 Fix Version to 3.11.12. If that > fix does go into 4.0, then LG-Nortel emergency calls will (by default) > also fail to trigger the new Alarm notification. I added it since I assumed that there is a simple error in config file generation... > > I know we're trying to close off 4.0, but consider also including > XCF-3581. Otherwise, the new Alarm notification behaviour won't be of > much use. > I think it's more important for the emergency call to go through than it is for it to raise alarm. But that just me. I have been told many times that emergency calls should go directly to gateways. If we are changing it now I want to see a clear statement that this is a new policy at the minimum from Scott and Martin rather than just silent approval of it. D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
