On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 15:52 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > > Another question I have in my mind is : > > If you have two systems behind NATs each with a domain name > sixp.example.local ( perfectly legal ) and you want to federate them > in the manner you are describing but without a B2BUA, will one system > not ge confused by the From header of the other?
That one answers itself - the '.local' domain is _local_. It's never going to work to expect that to work _anywhere_ with _anything_ outside it's scope. > And another question I have is about request size but we can put that > aside and assume for now that we can use a TCP connection between the > two. In theory, SIP should work with large requests over UDP, and sometimes it does. As you say, TCP is preferred in these cases. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
