On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:31 -0400, Dale Worley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:20 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> > It might be easier to leave the existing sipx-config --java alone, and
> > instead enhance the (also existing) sipxecs-config to add the
> > --components argument.
> 
> The problems with that are: (1) sipxecs-config doesn't exist (*), and
> (2) it doesn't split the sipx-config --java function (which really ought
> to be in sipXportLib) and the sipx-config --version function (which
> really ought to be in sipXecs).  (Although I suppose that "sipx-config
> --version" could be grandfathered to invoke "sipxecs-config --version".)

sorry ... I was thinking that the --version should also be moved into
sipxecs-config.  This would mean that that 'top level' script would not
be generated from the common template that generates the others.

> (*) The next chapter of this discussion regards components that do not
> have a sip*-config script to print their configured version.

grumble.... yes, well, fixing that is pretty trivial 

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to