On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 16:23 -0500, Alfred Campbell wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > In order to allow the Mediant1000/2000/3000 gateway to control the MWI
> > and Transfer Supplementary Services on a PRI-QSIG link I'm proposing
> > adding the following parameters to the Mediant INI file generated by
> > sipXconfig. These parameters are supported by the 5.0/5.2/5.4/5.6
> > versions of the Mediant firmware.
> > 
> > Please note that some of these parameters are already being sent to
> the
> > Audiocodes FXS gateways (as noted below):
> > 
> > EnableMWI          (default=0)           Already exists for FXS,
> > controls sending of MWI
> > DefaultNumber      (default=ServedUser)  Default indicates MWI
> > destination will be controlled by NOTIFY contents
> > MwiSourceNumber    (default blank)       Controls calling number in
> PRI
> > SETUP
> > VoiceMailInterface (default=3, hidden)   Default indicates PRI-QSIG
> MWI
> > 
> > SubscriptionMode   (default=1, hidden)   Already exists for FXS, but
> we
> > want no MWI subscription on PRI
> > 
> > TrunkTransferMode  (default blank)       Controls QSIG transfer
> > supplementary service
> > 
> > 
> > Any comments or suggestions?
> > Thanks...
> > Dave.
> 
> My only comment is it maybe good to think about how best to
> group/present these.  I know you have a very specific application you
> plan on using these for... Maybe the screens can reflect this?  instead
> of just adding more cryptic parameters to the Audiocodes it could be
> done in a way to enable the functionality you are developing.

Indeed - is there any reason why a normal sipXecs user would manipulate
any of these otherwise?  Can we just make an abstract setting "Enable
SIP MWI to QSIQ MWI" that then does all the right things?


_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to